The MLS once again broke the record for average attendance and total attendance in their best year yet.
The total number of attendees for the 2012 MLS season was 6,072,854. The first time that the league has broken 6 million attendees. To put it in perspective, the MLS broke 4 million in 2010 and 5 million in 2011 for the first times, so the MLS has attendance growth has been continual. Granted the addition of teams has helped this, but overall average attendance has spiked too.
The MLS posted the highest average attendance per game in 2012 with 18,801. This puts them as the 8th highest average attendance for a football league in the world. They are behind the Bundesliga, the Premier League, La Liga, Liga MX, Serie A, Eredivisie and the Chinese Super League. This does put the MLS above leagues such as Ligue 1, the Coca-Cola Championship, and Primera A Division in Argentina.
After fluctuation around 16,000 attendees per game for a few years (2007-2010), the MLS has started to grow as better talent, better soccer specific stadiums, and better atmospheres have created the MLS to what it is today. The MLS is not done growing, but it will be interesting to see if attendance can hold over the next few years with no new teams joining the league (besides a NY team presumably in 2014 or later). The lower attendance teams are growing though as the lowest team this year (Chivas USA) had an attendance of 13,056. Where as the past few years have had the lowest attended club be in the 9,000-11,000 range. There are a lot of positives to be seen from this year and the MLS is still a young league; there is much more to come in the next few years.
Comment on this if you want all 17 games of your team put up, if you would like a year by year of your team, or anything else.
I will work on an article with the stats in a graph in 1996 to truly see the MLS progression.
Don't hesitate to ask for some stats or an article. I will try to get written up ASAP around my busy college exam schedule.
Team | 2012 Average Attendance | Capacity | Percent Full | 2011 Average Attendance | % Change from 2011 |
Chicago Fire | 16,407 | 20,000 | 82.03% | 14,274 | +14.94 |
Chivas USA | 13,056 | 18,800 | 69.45% | 14,830 | -11.96 |
Colorado Rapids | 15,175 | 18,086 | 83.90% | 14,838 | +2.27 |
Columbus Crew | 14,397 | 20,145 | 71.47% | 12,185 | +18.15 |
DC United | 13,846 | 19,467 | 71.13% | 15,211 | -8.97 |
FC Dallas | 14,199 | 20,500 | 69.27% | +10.41 | |
Houston Dynamo | 20,946 | 22,000 | 95.21% | 17,694 | +18.38 |
Los Angeles Galaxy | 23,136 | 27,000 | 85.69% | 23,335 | -0.85 |
Montreal Impact | 22,772 | 20,341 | 111.95% | --- | --- |
NE Revolution | 14,001 | 20,000 | 70.01% | 13,222 | +5.90 |
New York Red Bulls | 18,281 | 25,000 | 73.13% | 19,691 | -7.16 |
Philadelphia Union | 18,053 | 18,500 | 97.58% | 18,258 | -1.12 |
Portland Timbers | 20,438 | 20,438 | 100.00% | 18,827 | +8.56 |
Real Salt Lake | 19,087 | 20,213 | 94.43% | 17,594 | +8.49 |
San Jose Earthquakes | 13,293 | 10,525 | 126.30% | 11,858 | +12.10 |
Seattle Sounders | 43,104 | 38,500 | 111.96% | 38,495 | +11.97 |
Sporting Kansas City | 19,404 | 18,467 | 105.08% | 17,810 | +8.95 |
Toronto FC | 18,155 | 21,140 | 85.88% | 20,267 | -10.42 |
Vancouver Whitecaps | 19,475 | 21,000 | 92.74% | 20,406 | -4.56 |
Average | 18,801 | 21,059 | 89.28% | 17,870 | +5.21 |
Do you have any thoughts concerning the attendance figures for the bottom dwellers. More specifically, do you think the league should consider relocating some of the perennial bottom dwellers in attendance? I know some of those teams are looking at soccer speific stadiums, but if the league continues advancing, 14k in Columbus just won't cut it in 5 years. It especially pains me being in the heart of the Southeast. I'm just curious regarding your opinion regarding expansion in the next 3-10 years. Also, some of these figures look awfully inflated. Columbus, New England, and New York (on top of a few others) raise a few red flags in that regard.
ReplyDeleteColumbus will be fine. They are growing, albeit very very slowly. I have reason to believe the numbers were forged a bit this year, but all in all it will grow. Columbus is and always has been a low budget team. They don't ever have more than 1 DP and pay him very little. It's just a shame cities can't get behind a team. We need to give away free drugs at the games.
DeleteHello, can I use your data to process the post? My name is Victor. I'm from Russia and have a blog about attendance of various competitions, especially about hockey.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sports.ru/tribuna/blogs/teilnahme/
Upon looking at your data it seems that in order for MLS to grow much more than it did this year it will take HUGE growth in the lower teams since most of the top teams are already averaging above 100% of capacity. I know San Jose gets a new stadium, but not till 2014. My guess is that if Chivas moved to San Diego and goes into Qualcomm stadium---they COULD do what Seattle is able to do and pack the place out at least on special event days.
ReplyDeleteOf course my desire is for The Revs to relocate to Atlanta and place a new team in Boston rather than in Foxboro. I also wish the Washington group could get a stadium deal in place so that DC United could get a real home field advantage.
FC Dallas is the biggest disappointment attendance wise in the league. I guess the old saying "build it and they will come" is not always true in sports----especially when you place it where only part of the Dallas area can get there easily.
Thanks for all you do----I love reading your blog!
Look, it's a little misleading to show overall average attendance is up 5 percent, and claim the total attendance figure is up 20 percent. You need a lot more analysis and explanation.
ReplyDeleteWhat source do you use for these, because I've seen others claiming 18,807 for the league and Sounders with 43,144
ReplyDeleteAny figures to Montreal minus the Olympic Stadium games?
ReplyDeleteWhat is sad is that 2 of the lower attendance teams are both owned by the same guy with tight purse strings. Both Columbus and Dallas are owned by the Hunt family, who don't spend on their teams.
ReplyDeleteThis implementation gives alert to ordinary user to fill up time logs in time so because of such software manually filling time log is restricted this is such great advantage of this software.Time Attendance Software in pune
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing such kind of nice and wonderful collection......Nice post Dude keep it up.
ReplyDeleteI have appreciate with getting lot of good and reliable and legislative information with your post......
San Diego real estate
I personally feel that the labor law compliance has been followed up with extreme clarity which confined a procedural approach to break the record. Basically where ever there is a proper compliance follow up, there is crystal clear approach for the end up of the segment.
ReplyDeleteIt is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like that very much.
ReplyDeleteTime and Attendance Solutions
Thanks for sharing such an informational blog which will, surely be a big help to the small medium enterprise so that they can choose the best suited tool for their business.
ReplyDeleteBest HR Software in India